News

U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) joined NBC’s Meet the Press to discuss the impact of Hurricane Helene and the latest with Hezbollah, Iran, Russia, and more. See below for highlights, and watch the full interview on YouTube and Rumble.

On destruction caused by Hurricane Helene and what comes next:

“The number one thing you want is to have power back up and the roads open, and the state is doing a great job of getting the roads cleared and open. Power obviously is more difficult. We were at a million people without power, and that number has dramatically dropped. 

“There are some parts of our state, I think about Cedar Key, for example. Beautiful place. People love going there. It’s tough to get there right now, but from all reports, it’s unfortunately been pretty much wiped out. So there are some coastal areas, some of which are now facing their third storm in the last 12 months. 

“As far as the resources look, it’s primarily a state obligation. The state steps forward if the state needs anything to give to local communities. That’s where FEMA comes in. And then we’re hoping to get a major declaration here today from the White House that will open up individual assistance to more counties, for people who have been displaced and have nowhere to live will qualify at the individual level for assistance in the short term while they get their lives back together.

“Our thoughts are also with people in Georgia and across the southeast who have also been impacted by the storm as it made its way through those states as well.”

On the Israeli airstrike that killed Hezbollah leader, Hassan Nasrallah:

“I think if Nasrallah was still alive, the threat of a broader conflict is even higher. This is a guy who cheerfully said, ‘Death to America, death to Israel.’ Now, when you’re a country and someone runs an organization that exists for the specific and defined purpose of destroying you, you have no choice but to treat that person as an enemy and to confront them. This is the guy that spent years cheering on suicide bombings that killed innocents, the kidnapping of Israelis.

“There are 60,000 Israelis right now who, for almost a year, have had to leave their homes in northern Israel and are living in hotels in Tel Aviv. Their kids are going to school online in conference rooms because the group that Nasrallah headed, which is Hezbollah, was using anti-tank weapons, not guided long-range missiles, anti-tank weapons, to target them and civilian infrastructure. So people had to leave. What country can have 60,000 people permanently displaced? That’s what this issue with Hezbollah is all about. 

“Israel wants a six to 10-mile buffer between itself and Hezbollah so they can’t be using these shoulder-fired rockets to target cities and civilian communities, so people can move back to their homes. Hezbollah refuses to pull back and continues with those attacks. So Israel has no choice but to defend itself. Wiping out not just Nasrallah, but the senior leadership of this evil organization, I think, is a service to humanity.” 

On whether Iran will retaliate against Israel:

“Iran is constantly looking to hurt Israel, and they seem to be willing to fight to the last Shia militia member. Ultimately, that will be Iran’s decision to make. Their goal is to dominate that region. They seek to drive America out of the region and then destroy Israel. Any time the Iranian regime is on defense, it’s good for the world, good for America, and good for Israel. It’ll be up to the Iranians to decide what they’re going to do. But I believe that they will find themselves in a very precarious situation if, in fact, they do escalate this on their part.”

On whether peaceful relations with Iran are possible:

“If the Iranian regime tomorrow said, ‘We’re going to stop trying to become the regional power, we’re going to stop our nuclear weapons, we’re going to stop sponsoring terrorism, we’re going to stop trying to kill you [which is what they’re trying to do with Donald Trump], we’re going to stop all of these things,’ theoretically, yes. Of course, you could work something like that out. That’s just unlikely because that’s the very driving mission and purpose of the regime…. 

“The Iranian people are nothing like the regime. I know of few countries in the world whose leaders and people are more different. The Iranian people are not seeking to be a regional hegemonic power. They’re not seeking to sponsor terrorism. In fact, there’s a lot of pressure inside of Iran among people arguing, with all the problems they have at home, why are they spending all this money on Shia militias and terrorists and Hezbollah and helping Hamas and building terrorist networks in the West Bank? 

“Ideally, that’s the world we’d love to live in. If that opportunity presents itself, who wouldn’t take it? What we can’t have is a world in which Iran has unlimited resources to continue to sponsor terrorism, build towards nuclear capability, and build these long-range rockets and missiles that they have developed in the last few years, which threaten not just Israel and the entire region, but ultimately the United States.”

On the inevitability of a negotiated settlement in Ukraine: 

“I’m not on Russia’s side, but, unfortunately, the reality of it is that the way the war in Ukraine is going to end is with a negotiated settlement. I want, we want, and I believe Donald Trump wants, for Ukraine to have more leverage in that negotiation. But in order to be in a position to be a broker who can bring about that agreement, I think he’s going to preserve what he says. He approaches these things not as someone in politics or diplomacy, but as someone with a background in business. It’s not going to be easy to do, but at least there’s a defined goal. 

“The Biden Administration has not defined what victory means in Ukraine. They have not defined, ‘This is what victory looks like,’ and if you press them, they will tell you what I have just said to you, which is the way this conflict ultimately ends, with a negotiation. I don’t know why we can’t just say that. We hope that when that time comes, there is more leverage on the Ukrainian side than on the Russian side. That really is the goal here in my mind. I think that’s what Donald Trump is trying to say, but he’s going to say it like a businessman. But Biden won’t even tell us what victory is.

“I think what the deal looks like will be up to the parties when they negotiate it. Obviously, Zelensky is not going to come out there and say it. From a negotiating standpoint, he’s not going to go out there and predetermine what it looks like. I understand why he wouldn’t want to go out there and define what it looks like at the front end. But the reality of it is that we, as Americans, are investing billions of dollars into this effort. It’s important that as we invest this money into this effort, we tell the American taxpayer, ‘This is what the money is going towards.’ Ultimately, it’s not an endless war. 

“I would be comfortable with a deal that ends these hostilities, and that I think is favorable to Ukraine, meaning that they have their own sovereignty, that they don’t become a satellite state or a puppet state that is constantly held hostage by the Russians. I’m not going to prejudge any agreement. 

“The Ukrainians don’t want to live in a country where the Russians dominate their territory. What’s the future of Crimea? The Russians claim it. Obviously, they stole it back in 2014, in the first invasion. You have to ask the Obama Administration why that happened under their watch. But at the end of the day, the most important thing here is that these hostilities end, Ukraine can go back to rebuilding its economy, and its people can move back. They’ve lost millions of people as refugees. It’s been devastating to them. But that negotiation is going to be up to them. I just want them to have more leverage than Putin.”